What our teacher want us to do this week is a miniature form of the Argument Analysis on the Petterson’s article:. Did you agree with Petterson? Does he make a good argument? How does he build his argument in a way you find compelling (or not)? What do you think his strongest and weakest evidence are? What did you notice about how he constructs his argument about the text? On Second page I want you to write 2 different replys on two different threats that I will be on attachment as well. It doest have to be long details will be also on attachment.
