Use the relevant course readings to evaluate the force of thisargument. (You should be able to determine which are relevant.) Isthis argument for skepticism a good one? What does your judgment withrespect to that last question mean for belief in skepticism based onarguments like the one I just presented? Should we form beliefs basedon arguments like this?This is a 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more thanthat. Cite the text to support your claims. Write the paper is if itwere a college paper. See the rubric for guidance.RubricGrading Rubric1. Does this paper identify have a clear thesis? (5%)2. Does this paper contain only relevant information? Are the citations completed properly? (5%)3. Does the paper attribute the correct view to the philosophers in question? (10%)4. Is/are the philosopher’s view presented with the appropriate level of detail?(For example, does the author explain concepts and arguments in a tight manner, or are the arguments and concepts merely sketched?)(25%)5. Does the author present a clear argument in his/her discussion? (15%)6. Does the paper cohere? Or, is the paper a hodgepodge of disparate ideas? (10%)7. Does the conclusion tie together the different phases of the paper? Or, is the conclusion anon-sequitur? (5%)8. Are the spelling, grammar and syntax on the college level? (5%)9. Does the author make appropriate and accurate use of course concepts in constructing his or her discussion? (20%) Intangibles: Is the paper on the assigned topic? Is it the author’s own work?
