Inductive generalization is sometimes mistaken for deductive categorical reasoning.Using what you’ve learned in your study of analogical reasoning, examine why inductive generalization is sometimes mistaken for deductive categorical reasoning, why this may happen?What are the similarities in the two? The differences?Where does the analogy break down?Pls reference this book as one of the scholarly sources: Jackson, D., & Newberry, P. (2016). Critical thinking: A user’s manual (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
