Identify external stakeholders who benefited from the Changing Directions organizational change and those who did not benefit. Define stakeholder concept from Bryson reading. Use external stakeholders as subheading. Out of state students could be considered external stakeholders. In Changing Directions study session and redesign meeting, regents and university presidents agreed to do away with 25 % cap on out of state students admissions criteria. However, they also saw out of state students and grad students as groups who could pay higher tuition (see 2006-06-AGENDA-Retreat moving toward enterprise model meeting minutes pp 3-4). Did state politicians/legislature/ABOR benefit from universities raising tuition? In 2002,as in 2004 etc., the state cut university funding. Remember they cut universities budgets and now universities making up shortfall by raising tuition. Bring in direct quotes from ABOR meeting minutes to support your writing. Identify internal stakeholders who benefited from Changing Directions and those who did not benefit? Use internal stakeholders as subheading. Talk about low income students vs middle income students and financial aid set asides. Did ASU benefit from being able to set own admissions standards, raise tuition and engage in enterprise activities? Bring in direct quotes from ABOR meeting minutes to support your writing. What about President Crow? Would his presidency to this point have been as successful without Changing Directions? Bring in direct quotes from ABOR meeting minutes to support your writing. Remember Changing Directions moving to enterprise model allowed universities to engage in enterprise activities. Body Sec 3 -Use this heading Use subheadings shown below Strategies for Successful Change Internal ASU stakeholders External stakeholders Changing Existing Vision and Values Section 3 Conclusion -Briefly restate key points of this section Paper Conclusion -Restate key knowledge share in the three sections of the paper.
