Pharmaceutical Pricing: How Patients and Providers Are Affected Use the sources, annotations, and thought process in the annotated bibliography attached. I noted to use 22 sources, I have provided 12 of them in the annotated bibliography, please use them plus an additional 10 sources. I have attached both text books for use too. The annotated bibliography is not to be copied into the final paper. The references become a part of the APA reference list. The annotations are re-worked and synthesized into the paper narrative. That assignment is designed to help students think through their research. It is a stepping stone to this assignment.A key starting point for your research early in the course should be the idea that managerial decisions have consequences beyond the firm, and that increasing profits may not be the only reason for making a decision. Re-read Arce (2004) on ethics in managerial economics. Also, review the characteristics of managerial economics. See also Ethical Decision Making.For instance, legal scholars debate the finding of the Michigan State Supreme Court decision in Dodge v. Ford (1919) , that corporations exist mainly to provide dividends to shareholders, above all other stakeholders. (See also the somewhat biased but still useful Dodge v. Ford Court Case Helps Explain How Corporations Work Today https://jalopnik.com/the-dodge-v-ford-court-case-helps-explain-how-corporat- 1821512982 (Links to an external site.).) This finding shapes the current dogma that profit-maximization and cost cutting (e.g., wages) are primary concerns of corporate managers. Yet, what does that do to humanity as we continue to move to more capital displacing labor, machines > people, e.g., autonomous long-distance semi-trucks? Do corporations have a duty to society and, if so, to what extent?This paper explores social justice issues in microeconomic decision making. (Specifics: at least 10 pages in APA format, not counting the title or references pages or any appendices, with at least 20 references, in one of these file formats–doc, docx, rtf, or pdf) At its core the paper is concerned with the unintended (or perhaps intended) consequences of making decisions based primarily on numbers, financial analysis, or algorithms. Two of your 20 references will be Baptist (2014) and Wilkinson (2005), with Stengel (2012) as an optional third.Research (through ProQuest or other peer-reviewed journals issues of managerial economics that interest you with foci on historical contexts of American capitalism, esp. the legacy in our economy of the history of chattel slavery as it applies to your topic (Baptist, 2014), and social justice consequences of managerial economic decisions in your area of interest. Include Wilkinson (2005) liberally for theoretical foundations in your paper and feel free to use Stengel (2012) if you like.This will be a well-written graduate-level research paper. The paragraphs cover one theme (not just one article per paragraph but a synthesis of articles on that one theme in the paragraph); contain clear sentences free of grammatical and spelling errors; have clear transitions between paragraphs; the whole leading to a compelling conclusion that logically flows from the preceding analysis. Logical fallacies are conspicuous by their absence. More than one point of view is considered in the paper before coming to its logical conclusions (see below). Be sure to mostly analyze and synthesize, not merely summarize (click link for definitions).Use a dialectical writing style e.g., https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel-dialectics/ In this, seek out and analyze opposing points of view and synthesize areas of agreement and note areas of disagreement. Apply your own brain power to come to conclusions based on economic principles we’ve studied: managerial, historical, and so on (from your 20+ sources). On the other hand, a failing paper is organized along these lines: para. 1, “the first article said this”; para. 2, “the next article said this”; and so on. This failing-paper example is a summary, not analysis and synthesis.
