As we discussed a little during Unit 1, there is often an unrealistic expectation of a criminalinvestigation and of criminal investigators. From an unrealistic timeline of when a casewill be solved or even if it CAN be solved to a misinformed understanding of what we cando and will do with various types of evidence. Again, we may be able to attribute part ofthis disconnect to the media, television and movies, but is it possible real life will somedayimitate art? Or is already happening and art is imitating real life? Can law enforcement,in some circumstances, process evidence in an hour, enhance the digital quality of asecurity camera enough to pick up on the tiniest details or even solve cases with thetiniest amount of DNA or the smallest partial finger print?For this Final Mastery Assignment, you are being asked to prepare an Essay.This Mastery Essay should examine the future technological breakthroughs which couldenhance criminal investigations. Please list at least 5 realistic technological advancements in the area of criminalinvestigations and explain how they may change our current modus operandi in thefield. Explain both the potential of abuse of these advancements and the potentialadvantage of these advancements.o Meaning, are there ethical concerns with these advancements and will theimplementation of them be justified due to the overall positive outcomes ofutilizing them?o I am not looking merely for a list of cool tricks you have seen in a “Syfy”movie trailer. Rather, I am looking for actual viable tools which may, someday,be an option for professionals in our field, so be sure to ground youradvancement ideas in research.Additional Requirements: This Essay should be a double-spaced paper using 12pt. Times New Roman font and 1” margins. The body of your paper must be at least 1,250 words, NOT including the Title,Abstract, and Reference pages. Additionally, follow other APA formatting guidelines; Section Headings,Introduction, Conclusion, in-narrative citations etc. You must utilize AT LEAST six (6) reputable outside sources, two (2) of which mustbe peer-reviewed.
