Lecture review requires:1. The key concepts, projects and people featured in the lecture2. A summary of the main argument or theme of the lecture3. Additional work based on independent research, discussing ideas and concepts with peers is an effective way to acquire knowledgeNB, It is very important that you conduct independent research. Examples of what you might doinclude: following-up any recommended reading given by the lecturer; investigating the projects,architects and theorists featured in the lecture; conduct a building visitLecture 1:An Introduction to Gender and Architecture(750 words each)Lecture 2:Architecture and Heritage: The role of architecture in a post-conflict environment(750 words each) I have separated the lecture slides in two partsAssessment Criteria:Followed up themes and ideas given in the lecture series and examined them in further detail through self-directed and group work using library, electronic and online resources:1. Evidence of creative, extensive and imaginative research that draws from a range of online, electronic and printed sources to further explore the lecture themes2. Evidence of independent, critical thought and evaluation based on researchWorked collaboratively to prepare a single document that presents ideas and arguments related to the lecture series, group discussions and research using a range of written and visual methods:1. Comprehensive reviews of each lecture that meet the word count and demonstrate a high level of engagement and understanding2. Strong evidence of excellent teamwork and group discussions.3. A high standard of written English and quality citations which are presented consistently4. Excellent use of a wide range of relevant images and an exceptionally well-designed layout
