In other words, do deliberation and the harm principle solve the problem that this kind of power (which Mill is talking about) is constructing norms and truths?

The Lockean/liberal overthrow of monarchy has resulted in the broad (postmodern) social constructive power explained by Mill. If Mills liberal solutions the harm principle and deliberation cannot counter this power, liberalism has actually made us less free, not more.”
…In other words, do deliberation and the harm principle solve the problem that this kind of power (which Mill is talking about) is constructing norms and truths?

You can argue in favor of this prompt or in opposition to it. Have the paper consist of 4 paragraphs: an introduction, a paragraph supporting your argument, a counter-argument paragraph which challenges the basis of your original position, and a conclusion paragraph. In the conclusion, indicate why you remain in favor of your position despite that which might counter it. Please use 7 citations from the 3 sources listed. I also uploaded the prompt pdf straight from the class.