Develop a PowerPoint presentation reviewing the theories from each module. Please select one theory from each module (1-8) and answer the following questions. You should have two slides per theory:
1. Describe the theory
2. Provide 3 examples of how the theory applies to current practice
3. Provide 3 positive patient outcomes resulting from utilizing the theory
4. Explain 3 benefits to nursing satisfaction when utilizing the theory
5. Describe two barriers to using the theory in practice and at least one method for overcoming each barrier (support methods with sources)
Nursing theorist:
Florence Nightingale – Environment theory.
Hildegard Peplau – Interpersonal theory.
Virginia Henderson – Need Theory.
Dorothy Johnson – System model.
Dorothea Orem – Self-care theory.
Imogene King – Goal Attainment theory.
Betty Neuman – System model
Sister Calista Roy – Adaptation theory
Jean Watson – Philosophy and Caring Model
Helen Erikson – Development Theory
Support from literature clearly noted throughout
The PowerPoint presentation should include at least two outside references and the textbook. The presentation should contain 2 to 4 slides per theory, for a total of 16 to 32 slides.
Textbook Reference:
Smith, M. C., & Parker, M. E. (2015). Nursing Theories and Nursing
Practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
GRADING RUBRIC
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria
Does Not Meet 0%
Approaches 60%
Meets 70%
Exceeds 100%
Criterion: Content/Quality of Information Weight: 40%
0 points
Topic is inappropriate to assignment, not based on scholarly information (if required), unclear and difficult to understand, no hyperlinks to credible sites; did not include required assignment components; slide notes missing (if required).
24 points
Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but not based on scholarly information (if required); mostly clear and understandable; may contain hyperlinks to non-credible sites; some of required assignment components are present; minimal use of slide notes (if required).
28 points
Good coverage of topic and appropriate to assignment; sound, research-based (if required) information; clear and understandable; hyperlinks to credible sites; all required assignment components are accurate and present; slide notes used appropriately (if required).
40 points
In-depth coverage of topic and assignment components; outstanding clarity of information; detailed slide notes ensure all required content is well explained (if required).
/ 40
Criterion: Presentation Weight: 20%
0 points
Unattractive; difficult to interpret; poor color choice and slide contrast; slide presentation unorganized; slide effects detract from the content; missing slide headings or sub-headings (if required for organization purposes); missing title/reference slides.
12 points
Attractive but somewhat difficult to interpret; somewhat pleasing contrast between text and background, slide presentation may be somewhat disorganized; transitions and slide effects detract from the content; may be missing title or reference slides; included slide headings/sub-headings may detract from presentation.
14 points
Attractive; easy to interpret, pleasing colors with strong contrast between text and background, slide presentation organized, good use of transitions and slide effects which enhance the presentation; both title and reference slides are present. Slide headings/sub-headings are used appropriately to organize the presentation.
20 points
Excellent use of transitions and effects that enhance the presentation. Presentation is organized and designed for maximum impact of content.
/ 20
Criterion: Use of Multimedia, Graphics, Diagrams, and/or Illustrations Weight: 30%
0 points
Does not include required multimedia, graphics, diagrams, and/or illustrations or they are irrelevant to topic or detract from slide content or presentation as a whole.
18 points
Required multimedia, graphics, diagrams, and/or illustrations are generally relevant but some may not appropriately support the slide content.
21 points
Required multimedia, graphics, diagrams, and/or illustrations are highly relevant and acceptably support the slide content; sized and positioned appropriately.
30 points
Required multimedia, graphics, diagrams, and/or illustrations add clarity and sophistication to the presentation content; they improve the effectiveness of the presentation.
/ 30
Criterion: Writing, Mechanics, and APA Weight: 10%
0 points
Style is inappropriate or does not address given audience, purpose, etc. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, and punctuation; APA format and style are not evident throughout the presentation.
6 points
Style is somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. There are missing APA elements or some are incorrectly formatted throughout the presentation.
7 points
Style is appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting. Reference slide and in-text citations have few formatting errors.
10 points
Style shows originality and creativity. Word choice is dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. Reference slide and other in-text citations are formatted correctly using APA elements.
/ 10
Rubric Total Score
Total
/ 100
Overall Score
Overall Score
Level 1
0 points minimum
Level 2
60 points minimum
Level 3
70 points minimum
Level 4
100 points minimum
