Instructions
In Unit 1, you identified recent technological advancements that have impacted human beings. In Unit 2, you analyzed the life cycle of a social problem related to that technological advancement. In Unit 3, you explained the impact of this technological advancement on both individuals and society. In Unit 4, you identified key stakeholders that you plan to engage as a change agent to solve a technologically related social problem. In Unit 5, you developed a moral argument to persuade stakeholders into accepting/implementing your reform. In Unit 6, you created a proposal to coordinate action between stakeholders participating in your reform coalition.
Now, you are going to create a PowerPoint slideshow to present your proposal. This presentation should conform to the following expectations:
Create a 5-10 minute video narrating your PowerPoint slides. View this video for guidance on this task.
Divide your PowerPoint slideshow into major subheadings related to the proposal you submitted in Unit 6.
Use brief bullet points on your slides that are then explained as you present the material. Extensive information on a slide is overwhelming to audience members.
Include visual images in your PowerPoint slides to accompany the points being made.
Be certain to take the feedback on your proposal you received into consideration.
Make sure to support each point with facts derived from valid outside sources selected with the methods covered in this weeks discussion post. Be sure to cite all sources using APA formatting style (Links to an external site.).
Estimated time to complete: 6 hours
Rubric
SS350 Unit 7 Assessment – Social Issue Presentation
SS350 Unit 7 Assessment – Social Issue Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
42.0 pts
Level 5
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.
38.0 pts
Level 4
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.
34.0 pts
Level 3
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.
29.0 pts
Level 2
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.
25.0 pts
Level 1
Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions
42.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
PRICE-P
42.0 pts
Level 5
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
38.0 pts
Level 4
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
34.0 pts
Level 3
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
29.0 pts
Level 2
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
25.0 pts
Level 1
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
42.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
28.0 pts
Level 5
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.
25.0 pts
Level 4
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.
22.0 pts
Level 3
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.
20.0 pts
Level 2
Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.
17.0 pts
Level 1
Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.
28.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
21.0 pts
Level 5
The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
19.0 pts
Level 4
The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
17.0 pts
Level 3
The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication
15.0 pts
Level 2
The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
13.0 pts
Level 1
The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
21.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
PRICE-I
7.0 pts
Level 5
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.
6.0 pts
Level 4
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.
5.0 pts
Level 3
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.
4.0 pts
Level 2
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.
3.0 pts
Level 1
The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements
0.0 pts
Level 0
There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
7.0 pts
