In July 1989, Allison was born at Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne with severe birth defects. She had an extreme case of spina bifida that left her grossly deformed and paralysed below the waistline, and she was suffering from brain malformation marked by hydrocephalus that meant she was most likely mentally disabled and would suffer seizures. Within days she developed severe breathing issues. Neonatal physician Peter Loughnan informed her parents of their daughter’s poor outlook and the low quality of life she would face if she survived. He recommended the parents consider a “conservative treatment, in which Allison would be cuddled, fed and relieved of any pain,” with no life-saving measures performed. He consulted with other specialists, including fellow neonatal physician Peter McDougall, who “strongly supported” Loughnan’s assessment of the infant. They believed any surgery would be futile. After consulting two Catholic priests and seeking guidance from relatives, Allison’s parents agreed with the doctor’s recommendation. A relative informed the Victorian Right to Life Association of the parents’ decision to withhold lifesaving treatment upon the advice of medical staff. When Allison was seven days old, the activists arrived at Royal Children’s Hospital and demanded to see her parents, announcing they wanted to adopt her. When this was unsuccessful, the activists called the police and told them a baby was being drugged and starved to death at the hospital, causing detectives to investigate. After Allison’s death at 12 days old, the Right to Life group accused the parents and the doctors of murdering her. *Using the four principles and five approaches of Bio-Ethics, discuss the appropriateness of the following case. Also, discuss the aspect of medical futility in this case. (Do you consider this case futile? What is your overall opinion) Conclude your stance and discuss all ethical implications.*