Rhetorical analysis of all three reports.Conduct a rhetorical analysis of the report, detailing and synthesizing crucial features of their purposes/contexts, writers, audiences, and textual features. Conclude by discussing their most salient similarities and differences, as well as what counts as persuasive delivery in each.- How the report’s content makes it appropriate for that specific genre- How the writers of the report are specific and expert to that writing situation- How the report’s organization contributes to its overall purpose (i.e where the report’s main findings, explanations, and data are housed. Why do they appear in that location, and how does it impact the overall whole?)- How the audience and publication venue for the report shapes its content and writers- Any distinctive matters of style, such as the use of qualifiers, scientific terminology, and or passive voiceIN IMRAD modelAlso, the introduction should have context, problem, and response.
